Vidudala Part 1

 

I recently watched Viduthalai Part 1. I know I’m a bit late, considering Part 2 is already out in theaters. For some reason, I’ve always been hesitant about watching Vetrimaaran’s movies. I think it’s because his films feel so raw and realistic, often reflecting the struggles of Tamil people, which I can’t always relate to. That said, I did enjoy his blockbuster Asuran.

Anyway, with all the buzz surrounding Viduthalai Part 2 on various forums, I decided to give Part 1 a try. I have to say, I regret not watching this earlier, at least when it released on OTT. It’s quintessential Vetrimaaran—gritty, intense, and realistic—but never boring. The film is deeply engaging from start to finish.

The story begins with Kumaresan, a newly recruited constable tasked with assisting a police operation to capture Perumal, the leader of an extremist group called the People’s Army (Praja Dalam in Telugu). The operation, named “Ghost Hunt,” is aimed at suppressing the People’s Army, which opposes a mining company trying to exploit a hilly region in Tamil Nadu. The People’s Army resembles the Naxalite-Maoist groups that were prominent in Andhra Pradesh and nearby states during that time. They resist industries encroaching on common people’s lands, and the parallels with real-life events are striking.

It’s remarkable to see Soori, known primarily as a comedian in his earlier films, deliver such a convincing performance. He completely disappears into the role of Kumaresan, making it hard to associate him with his comedic past.

One of the film’s standout sequences is the depiction of a train derailment incident, which leaves many injured. The government attributes the attack to the People’s Army. This sequence alone captures Vetrimaaran’s trademark style and attention to detail. The train derailment is depicted with stunning realism, enhanced by some breathtaking drone shots that offer a bird’s-eye view of the wreckage. I couldn’t help but wonder about the budget for this episode—it feels so lifelike, almost on par with Hollywood standards. This scene hooked me completely.

The rest of the film follows Kumaresan’s journey, highlighting his determination to help common people, even when it means defying higher-ranking officers. His defiance lands him in trouble, including being relegated to demeaning tower duty. I admired Kumaresan’s moral resolve—despite being urged by colleagues to apologize to his superiors, he refuses, standing by his belief that he did the right thing. This unwavering sense of justice drives his character and sets him apart.

Kumaresan also forms a bond with Tamilarasi (“Pappa”), whom he plans to marry. The actress playing Tamilarasi is unrecognizable outside the role, thanks to her natural makeup and authentic portrayal of a rural woman. This attention to casting and character authenticity is a hallmark of Vetrimaaran’s work, ensuring that actors’ real-life personas never overshadow their on-screen roles.

The film’s locations are incredibly realistic, shot in what seems to be remote hilltop villages. Some scenes, especially the interrogation sequences, are deeply disturbing. The police brutality depicted—such as stripping women naked and subjecting them to relentless torture—is harrowing to watch. These moments highlight Vetrimaaran’s commitment to portraying uncomfortable truths, even if they are tough to stomach. At the same time, he ensures these scenes are woven into the narrative seamlessly, keeping the audience engaged. While such sequences might not sit well with all viewers, particularly in Telugu audiences, they showcase the harsh realities of abuse and power dynamics.

The climax is gripping and keeps you on the edge of your seat. It reminded me of the iconic Pablo Escobar rooftop capture scene as Kumaresan leaps between rooftops to guide his team in capturing Perumal, played by Vijay Sethupathi. While Vijay Sethupathi doesn’t have much screen time in Part 1, it’s clear he plays a pivotal role in Part 2.

The background score by Ilaiyaraaja perfectly complements the film. Vetrimaaran’s decision to choose Ilaiyaraaja, who was at the peak of his career in the 1980s, adds authenticity to the setting. The music is unique and enhances the period feel. Velraj’s cinematography is excellent, with drone shots effectively capturing the vastness and ruggedness of the landscapes. The supporting cast also delivers commendable performances.

Overall, Viduthalai Part 1 is a typical Vetrimaaran film with an engaging screenplay and brutal, gritty scenes that are hard to watch. But it is a must-watch for any movie lover. My rating: 8.5/10.

Lucky Baskhar

When a few movies were released during Diwali 2024, I decided to watch only one and chose “Ka” over “Lucky Bhaskar.” But after finally watching Lucky Bhaskar on Netflix, I couldn’t help but wish I’d seen it on the big screen. It’s easily one of the best movies of 2024.

As an engineer with experience in the stock market sector and someone who enjoyed web series like Scam 1992 (based on Harshad Shantilal Mehta), I found the story deeply relatable. The movie is incredibly engaging, with plenty of goosebump-worthy moments throughout.

The plot revolves around a private bank employee struggling to support his family on a modest salary. It follows how he discovers loopholes in the banking system and uses them to amass wealth, leading to a gripping and thought-provoking narrative.

Director Venky Atluri, known for his rom-coms like Tholi Prema, has taken a bold new direction with Lucky Bhaskar. While his recent movie Sir hinted at this shift, this film solidifies it. The story and screenplay are exceptionally crafted. What’s truly remarkable is how the film delivers heroic, adrenaline-pumping moments without relying on fights, loud music, or dramatic dialogues. Some scenes are as impactful as any mass entertainer, and the hero breaking the fourth wall to address the audience felt fresh and unique. It reminded me of House of Cards when Kevin Spacey would speak directly to viewers, explaining the intricacies of his schemes.

Atluri’s research into banking systems shines through, with the film showcasing how bank receipts were exploited and how import taxation loopholes were manipulated. Every 10-15 minutes, there’s a powerful elevation scene that keeps you hooked. Some of the dialogues are so meaningful they could double as life lessons or motivational quotes.

That said, I did have a minor gripe. While it’s understandable that the hero, as a private banker, faces financial struggles, it felt odd that he borrowed money from ordinary people in his colony. As a banker, he should have had better options, like taking loans from colleagues or the bank itself. The way his neighbors humiliate him felt somewhat exaggerated.

There’s also a sequence involving a trip to Goa that seemed like creative liberty. However, if you overlook these minor inconsistencies, the rest of the film—especially how the hero outsmarts stock market players, high-ranking bank officials, and even Harshad Mehta’s PA—is an exhilarating experience.

Dulquer Salmaan delivers an outstanding performance, capturing every nuance of his character’s frustration, cunning, helplessness, and determination. It felt like watching a real person caught in the system. Meenakshi Chowdary also impressed as his wife, continuing to shine in her recent roles. The supporting cast was equally commendable, with everyone adding depth to the story.

G.V. Prakash’s background score is a huge asset, elevating many key moments. The production design deserves applause for beautifully recreating the era on a modest budget, making every frame feel authentic.

Overall, Lucky Bhaskar is a standout Telugu film, tackling the banking and stock market world in a way that even common audiences can understand and appreciate. It proves that you can create thrilling, goosebump-inducing scenes without a drop of blood or lengthy monologues. It’s films like these that make me proud of Telugu cinema.

My rating: 9.5/10.

Mechanic Rocky

I watched Mechanic Rocky on Amazon Prime, and I really liked it. Honestly, I was surprised by how good it was. When Vishwak Sen was so confident about this movie during the pre-launch event, I felt skeptical. It seemed like it was going to be a routine movie.

The title, Mechanic Rocky, feels like a big misdirection—maybe on purpose. With a name like that, I thought it was going to be like Mechanic Alludu or some 90s-style movie. But it turned out to be completely different. The concept is fresh, and it’s definitely worth a watch.

I actually started watching it only because someone told me, “Go watch it, you’ll like it.” At first, it felt like a regular story—up until the interval. But in the second half, the movie completely changes direction. It becomes something totally unexpected and focuses on a very relevant topic, which I won’t reveal here.

One thing I kept thinking about is why the director chose this mechanic backdrop. The main story could have worked with any setting. Maybe it was Vishwak Sen’s idea to make it appealing to the masses. Whatever the reason, it works well. Vishwak Sen once again shows he has a great sense for picking the right stories. The last movie of his I liked was Ashoka Vanamlo Arjuna Kalyanam.

I won’t spoil anything about the story because the thrill is in not knowing what to expect. Just trust Vishwak Sen and watch the movie till the end—you won’t regret it. Towards the climax, I felt this is the kind of story we usually see in Malayalam cinema. But here, they’ve mixed that Malayalam-style script with a Telugu backdrop and comedy, and it works beautifully.

As for director Ravi Teja Mullapudi, I think this is his first movie, and he’s done a great job. The story is fresh and deals with a very current issue faced by Indian youth. I’m not sure if he’s related to the famous Mullapudi family, but his work here stands out. One suggestion I’d have is that he could have added a few suspenseful scenes here and there to keep the audience engaged. Other than that, he’s done really well, and I’m looking forward to more from him.

Vishwak Sen is fabulous in this role, and he gets to show different shades of his character. Meenakshi, the heroine, also has an important role, and Shraddha Srinath’s character is excellent. At first, you might wonder why her character is even there, but later, it all makes sense, and you’ll be amazed.

The music is good. I especially liked the song Oo Pillo—it’s my favorite from the album. The rest of the songs are decent. The cast and crew have done a solid job overall.

In conclusion, I’d give this movie 7.5/10. It’s a thrilling watch, and don’t let the title mislead you. Give it a try—you’ll be pleasantly surprised.

Pushpa 2: The Rule

These are my thoughts after watching Pushpa 2. The last time a movie left me so emotionally charged was Baahubali 2.

Pushpa, an ordinary coolie with a brash and arrogant demeanor, is haunted by the stigma of being an illegitimate child. His siblings refuse to share their surname with him, which deeply affects him. The first part of the story portrays his rise as a sandalwood syndicate leader, driven by his attitude and fearlessness. Along the way, he faces numerous enemies. Pushpa 2 continues his journey and takes it to a gripping and emotional conclusion.

In my opinion, Pushpa 1 became a sensational hit because the protagonist resonated deeply with the common Indian audience. Pushpa represents people who are constantly suppressed, ignored, and denied recognition. His defiance against these odds made the audience see themselves in him, and they celebrated his victories as their own.

In Pushpa 2, Sukumar ensures that the core essence of Pushpa's character remains intact. Pushpa doesn’t care about wealth or fame; his self-esteem and anger toward a society that looks down on him drive every decision he makes. This reminded me of the Joker in The Dark Knight, who burns a pile of money, saying, “It’s not about money; it’s about sending a message.” Pushpa’s actions, power, and defiance are a direct message to those who label him a bastard or a smuggler and refuse to respect him.

One of the most brilliant parts of the movie is the sequence where Pushpa’s wife, Srivalli, innocently asks him to take a photograph with the Chief Minister. But CM refuses. That simple incident hurts his ego. What happens next is Sukumar's brilliance in writing. He takes a seemingly trivial incident and builds the entire narrative around it. It reminded me of John Wick, where a simple gas station altercation and the death of a puppy set off an unforgettable series of events. The brilliance lies in crafting powerful drama from a small, relatable moment.

The first half, leading to the interval, revolves around the “kissik” photo incident, and the execution is phenomenal. The conflict between Pushpa and Bhanwar Singh Shekhawat is equally well-developed. Sukumar’s brilliance is evident when Pushpa says “sorry” to Shekhawat and the intense drama following that incident. The scene where Pushpa reflects on how people might perceive him for apologizing is exceptionally relatable. Many of us have felt this way when forced to compromise in life, even if it makes us look weak. But Pushpa is no ordinary man—he cannot live without his self-respect. His response to this situation, including his conversations with his friend Kesava, is is one of the best parts of the film.

The second half is packed with adrenaline-pumping action. Allu Arjun once again proves why he is among the best actors in the country. His acting, especially in the Jathara episode and the climax, is on another level. This performance silences critics who labeled him as merely a great dancer. Rashmika Mandanna also shines, with a stronger role and ample scope to perform.

The pre-climax fight deserves special mention. Yes, the setup might feel familiar, but the execution is extraordinary. Sukumar adopts Rajamouli’s technique of building tension and ensuring that the audience is fully invested in seeing the villains punished. When Pushpa finally delivers, the impact is massive and satisfying.

The climax is sentimental yet powerful, giving closure to Pushpa’s lifelong pain. The moment when his surname is finally printed on niece's wedding invitation card and he breaks down in tears is unforgettable. It ties everything together beautifully. Pushpa doesn’t care about money or fame—he’s been fighting for respect, for the right to be seen as an equal. That’s what makes this moment so emotional.

The songs composed by Devi Sri Prasad are major highlights, elevating the movie’s impact. The cinematography by Mirosław Kuba Brożek is exceptional, with a stunning use of fluorescent colors that adds depth to every scene. Sreeleela shines in a special song, demonstrating her exceptional dancing skills and solidifying her status as one of Telugu cinema’s finest dancers. All the other cast and crew members have done a fantastic job, making this movie a complete package.

While I hoped for full closure in this installment, the makers have decided to extend the story into a third part, which keeps the excitement alive.

Overall, Pushpa 2 is one of the best movie-watching experiences I’ve had. You cheer for Pushpa, you laugh with him, and you cry with him. What else can you ask for from a movie?

Go and watch it. You won’t regret it!

Gravity

When I first watched this movie in theater frankly I didn’t like it. Perhaps I had high expectations on this movie and expected so much action.  And those visuals showing Earth, space etc have seen many times in Netflix documentaries. So nothing felt new.

But when I watched again on my HDTV it looked so different. Apart from those breath taking visuals, another important aspect of this movie, which I missed to notice when I first time watched is, ‘hope’ – Yes this whole movie is based on ‘hope’ – not losing faith whatever happens– This movie teaches you how many struggles you face in your life, you shall never ever lose faith and keep trying to get things done.

No wonder this movie was nominated for ten awards and won seven in 86^th Academy Awards.

I think this plot can be made anywhere not just in space, this can be made in deep under sea water, or on Volcano mountain or any such place where things are abnormal for living – still they can show how the main lead character(Dr Ryan) can succeed without losing hope.

After watching scenes of satellites and space station destruction because of debris, I wonder whether this can really happen in space. Because we have so many satellites and space stations in space making rounds to earth. If it happens then it is going to be catastrophic. Hope it won’t happen.

Then it comes to actor’s performance. Sandra Bullock and George Clooney both are terrific actors. Especially Sandra’s performance in this movie is fantastic and so realistic. And George as Lieutenant also performed so well. You can learn so much from this character. Like how to think straight if things doesn’t go well. How to look for solutions in a place where no else can think there is a solution.

And this movie director Alfonso Cuaron is an all-rounder. He is the director/writer/producer/editor of this movie. When director becomes editor you can see there will be unnecessary scenes in movies because director loves each and every scene what he/she shoots in movie, where as editor knows the realities and cuts the scenes which are not necessary.  I felt some places more trimming in editing can be done.

I liked his previous works ‘Children of Men’ and ‘Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban’ he has his signature on all his movies.

Technical department is brilliant. I was not sure whether those aerial earth shots were done in CG or they used any NASA footage. If they are CG shots then they are brilliantly done. You can’t find the difference. I’ve heard that though everything looks scientific and realistic of those space shots but they took some liberty and exaggerated few concepts. Of course a movie is supposed to be like this if it is too accurate then it will be another Netflix documentary on space. Some people hoped that this movie might bring public interest back on space. I think that’s correct.

Anyway Gravity definitely a must watch film for any film lovers. If you already watched it watch it again, trust me you will feel different this time.

My score to this movie is 9/10.   

The attacks of 26/11

After reading many reviews on this movie as RGV’s come back film. I was very curious to watch it. But, I’ve waited for Telugu version to come out so I can better understand the dialogues. Some reason it is not released in Telugu so I had to watch it in Hindi.

Even in my opinion,  it is truly RGV’s come back movie as you can see his director's expertise in several scenes. It is based on 2008 Mumbai attacks, which is the one of the greatest tragedy in Indian history. This type of attacks indicates how fragile our security at coastal areas is.

The first 7 minutes of this movie, had already been released in youtube as a trailer before releasing it in theaters. It was first of its kind in film history to release 7 mins as a trailer. That trailer had created enough buzz in audience on the movie. Everybody thought after very long time, RGV is going to get a big hit. However, in reality, it got very poor openings.

The actor who played as a Ajmal Kasab exactly resembles him. I should appreciate RGV for casting him. While watching this movie, I was thinking how easy for anybody to come to India from Pakistan over the sea on a small boat?  I’m not sure, if there would be any patrolling boats on the sea as like on roads. Otherwise, how could they come without any fear?  There could be more attacks like this could happen if we don’t provide a tight security at our coastal line.

The first attack happened at Leopold Café, and following attacks happened at Taj hotel, Chatrapati Shivaji terminal and Cama Hospital. Those are the only attacks Ramu pictured in this movie. The scenes in those attacks are terrifying and felt as if I’m watching it on Live. I should also appreciate art department who made Taj hotel and the rest of the sets, they resemble original constructions.

As I said before, in many scenes you can see the director's talent. For e.g. in one scene people hiding on the side of platform with fear when terrorists are shooting at Chatrapathi terminal  (you must see that scene, I’ve not seen that before in any movie) and Constables throwing stones inside Leopold Cafe just to confirm whether terrorists are present.  After seeing those scenes, you can realize how much unprepared our police personnel for this kind of attacks.

As given in one of the reviews, RGV would have continued the movie after Kasab got caught, and would have showed how other Terrorists were killed. Otherwise, it feels he did half justice. Once they arrest Kasab then RGV moves total focus on him, and continues movie in his point of view till he dies. As a senior director, he knows how much to spend for a movie. He would have assumed that the scenes that involved shootings at Trident Hotel and Nariman house requires huge budget as it involves National Guards and Helicopters etc.  Since already he had spent 30 crore on this movie, so he might have not ready to spend more. What ever he made, he made with quality and perfection. If he would have spent even for other scenes, then that would have been a disaster to producers. Because this movie struggled to collect even that 30 crore though the reviews are positive. That is a surprise thing to me. 

I wanted to know what happened after Kasab caught and how other terrorists were killed, so I watched a CNN-IBN's program called ’60 Hours’ in YouTube, which is a documentary based on these attacks. That documentary is very detailed, and I think for many of RGV's scenes this program might be the reference. In that video, they had put CC camera footage of the shootings and  conversation that happened between those 10 terrorists and people behind them from Pakistan.  People who are behind them were guiding them to put Taj hotel on fire and asked them to kill people in Nariman House.

Regarding actors performance, I won’t say, this is Nana Patekar’s the best role or something as he did many better roles than this. But he fully justified to the character and the other guy who played as Kasab also done a good job. The background music is excellent and elevated the scenes. Overall, it is unquestionably RGV’s best in recent times, though sadly it became an average film as per box office reports. I wish he would continue to make movies like this. Probably he can make a part 2 to show other incidents that happened at Trident hotel and Nariman house.

My rating for this movie is 8.

Argo

While watching Oscars 2012 live, I was hoping “Life of PI” may get the best picture award. But, surprisingly (May be it is surprise only to me) they had proclaimed “Argo” as best picture for 2012. Until then,  I was not intrigued in watching this movie though it was nominated for Oscars, otherwise decided to watch it to figure out what is that it is in that movie that made it as the best film. Usually award winning movies means, in my notion, very bore to watch as they contain melodramatic story with historical background or war related with less to almost zero action. Bottom line is, we (I) can’t “enjoy” while watching all award wining movies. The best example is 2009 Oscar best picture, “The Hurt Locker”. That movie got Oscar award over “Avatar”that year. I’m still wondered how it got best picture over Avatar. Anyway, there are exceptions, sometimes few movies, which are very entertaining to watch and the same time won “best picture” award. For e.g “The Lord of the Rings”, “Titanic” etc.

With that, I watched “Argo” movie. As a plot, it is a true story of how a CIA agent rescued six US diplomats from Tehran, Iran, during 1979 Iran hostage crisis. The rescue was called as “Canadian Caper”. There is a twist in how actually he had planned to rescue them. I’m not going to reveal that here. But, I assure you, it’s NOT a James bond kind of rescue. If that is the case then it would have become another old-style James Bond movie.  That twist is very interesting and keeps you to watch the whole movie without feeling bored.

The actor plus director Ben Affleck is a back bone for this movie. His direction is very nice, but acting; I don’t know somehow I don’t see certain expressions on his face, he is subtle. I knew him before as he acted in many action movies like Armageddon, Pearl Harbor.  He did very good action in those movies. Perhaps his expressions are choked off because of his beard in this movie. They almost succeeded to replicate 1979 atmosphere, in terms of actors get up, hair style and locations. Only the Ben Affleck (Tony Mendez) get up does not feel as he was from 1979 era. They should have taken much care on this makeup.

I wondered seeing Iran’s women holding guns and leading revolutionary guards that to in 1979 in this movie!!! I didn’t realize that women in Iran had so much courage during that time which is almost 35 years back. Some of the "Iran's" shots as hanging a person on the public road, protesters demolishing the walls of US embassy etc, are brilliantly pictured. It was terrifying to anybody witnessing angry protesters wrecking everything and trying to capture them. The interesting thing is the people of Iran that time, they rebelled US people so much, but whereas they were favored Canadians, who were long term friends to Americans. They even didn’t think that Canadian people who lived in Iran may try to help US diplomats due to their long companionship with USA.

There are many tensed scenes towards climax, I don’t know whether absolutely happened in that way, but, in the movie, it was like “edge of seat” scenes and glues you to the screen. Though it was American CIA agent Tony Mendez who planned whole rescue, due to the classified nature of the case, US suppressed it and gave full credit to Canada government.  Hence it named as “Canadian Caper”. The whole details were revealed to public only in 1997.

Overall this movie is very interesting to watch due to the fact that it is a true story and they had rescued US diplomats using cinematic idea. I’m satisfied with this movie and felt it is a good pick for best picture award. After all in that way US can show to the world, how ingenious their CIA agents were ;). I’m giving 8 out of 10 to this movie.